mirrors/apparmor.d
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/roddhjav/apparmor.d.git synced 2024-12-24 14:06:47 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1

Change ... to etc

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Stoppedpuma 2024-06-07 21:22:04 +02:00 committed by Alex
parent 7a7479906a
commit 129f044ce7
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
docs/concepts.md
View file

@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ There are over 50000 Linux packages and even more applications. It is simply not
**What to confine and why?** **What to confine and why?**
We take inspiration from the [Android/ChromeOS Security Model](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1904.05572v2.pdf), and we apply it to the Linux world. Modern [Linux security distributions](https://clip-os.org/en/) usually consider an immutable core base image with a carefully selected set of applications. Everything else should be sandboxed. Therefore, this project tries to confine all the *core* applications you will usually find in a Linux system: all systemd services, xwayland, network, bluetooth, your desktop environment... Non-core user applications are out of scope as they should be sandboxed using a dedicated tool (minijail, bubblewrap, toolbox...). We take inspiration from the [Android/ChromeOS Security Model](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1904.05572v2.pdf), and we apply it to the Linux world. Modern [Linux security distributions](https://clip-os.org/en/) usually consider an immutable core base image with a carefully selected set of applications. Everything else should be sandboxed. Therefore, this project tries to confine all the *core* applications you will usually find in a Linux system: all systemd services, xwayland, network, bluetooth, your desktop environment, etc. Non-core user applications are out of scope as they should be sandboxed using a dedicated tool (minijail, bubblewrap, toolbox, etc).
This is fundamentally different from how AppArmor is usually used on Linux servers as it is common to only confine the applications that face the internet and/or the users. This is fundamentally different from how AppArmor is usually used on Linux servers as it is common to only confine the applications that face the internet and/or the users.