Currently the wutmp abstraction has the following rules:
/var/log/lastlog rwk,
/var/log/wtmp wk,
@{run}/utmp rwk,
According to what I see in my apparmor profiles, just a few apps want
to interact with the files listed above, especially with the
/var/log/wtmp . But when the apps do this, they sometimes want the
read access to this file. An example could be the last command. Is
there any reason for not having the r in the rule? The second thing
is the file /var/log/btmp (which isn't included in the
abstracion). Whenever I see an app, which wants to access the
/var/log/wtmp file, it also tries to interact with the /var/log/btmp
file, for instance lightdm/sddm or su . Most of the time they need
just wk permissions, but sometimes apps need also r on this file, an
example could be the lastb command, which is just a link to last.
Fixes: https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/issues/152
MR: https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/merge_requests/724
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Tag profiles and abstractions with abi information.
Tagging abstractions is not strictly necessary but allows the parser
to detect when their is a mismatch and that policy will need an
update for abi.
We do not currently tag the tunables because variable declarations
are not currently affected by abi.
MR: https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/merge_requests/491
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Steve Beattie <sbeattie@ubuntu.com>
Local policy may want to extend or override abstractions, so add support for including local updates to them.
Acked-by: Christian Boltz <apparmor@cboltz.de>
Acked-by: intrigeri <intrigeri@boum.org>
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
make the final install layout match the layout in the repository (at
long last :) -- now we can use a single 'make check' target to check the
profiles in the repository against both apparmor_parser and logprof.
2007-05-16 18:51:46 +00:00
Renamed from profiles/abstractions/wutmp (Browse further)
