Minimization was failing because it was too agressive. It was minimizing
as if there was only 1 accept condition. This allowed it to remove more
states but at the cost of loosing unique permission sets, they where
being combined into single commulative perms. This means that audit,
deny, xtrans, ... info on one path would be applied to all other paths
that it was combined with during minimization.
This means that we need to retain the unique accept states, not allowing
them to be combined into a single state. To do this we put each unique
permission set into its own partition at the start of minimization.
The states within a partition have the same permissions and can be combined
within the other states in the partition as the loss of unique path
information is will not result in a conflict.
This is similar to what perm hashing used to do but deny information is
still being correctly applied and carried.
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Acked-By: Steve Beattie <sbeattie@ubuntu.com>
