Instead of having multiple tables, since we have room post split
of optimization and dump flags just move all the optimization and
dump flags into a common table.
We can if needed switch the flag entry size to a long in the future.
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Add the ability to control whether rule merging is done.
TODO: in the furture cleanup display of flags split accross two tables
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
In preparation for more flags (not all of the backend dfa based),
rework the optimization and dump flag handling which has been exclusively
around the dfa up to this point.
- split dfa control and dump flags into separate fields. This gives more
room for new flags in the existing DFA set
- rename DFA_DUMP, and DFA_CONTROL to CONTROL_DFA and DUMP_DFA as
this will provide more uniform naming for none dfa flags
- group dump and control flags into a structure so they can be passed
together.
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Add the ability to show which warnings are enabled by specifying "show"
as an to the --dump, --warn, and --Optimize options
Eg.
--warn=show
MR: https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/merge_requests/600
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
