If we set an instruction as ready twice, it decreases the transaction's
num_waiting a second time and applies the transaction earlier than it
should. This no doubt has undesired effects, probably resulting in a use
after free.
Hopefully fixes the first part of #2207.
wl_event_source_remove() is illegal after display has been destroyed,
so just destroy everything when we still can.
==20392==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free on address 0x607000001240 at pc 0x00000048e86e bp 0x7ffe4b557e00 sp 0x7ffe4b557df0
READ of size 8 at 0x607000001240 thread T0
#0 0x48e86d in wl_list_insert ../common/list.c:149
#1 0x7fdf673d4d7d in wl_event_source_remove src/event-loop.c:487
#2 0x41b742 in ipc_terminate ../sway/ipc-server.c:94
#3 0x40b1ad in main ../sway/main.c:440
#4 0x7fdf6664c18a in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308
#5 0x409359 in _start (/opt/wayland/bin/sway+0x409359)
0x607000001240 is located 48 bytes inside of 72-byte region [0x607000001210,0x607000001258)
freed by thread T0 here:
#0 0x7fdf692c4880 in __interceptor_free (/lib64/libasan.so.5+0xee880)
#1 0x7fdf673d371a in wl_display_destroy src/wayland-server.c:1097
previously allocated by thread T0 here:
#0 0x7fdf692c4c48 in malloc (/lib64/libasan.so.5+0xeec48)
#1 0x7fdf673d4d9e in wl_event_loop_create src/event-loop.c:522
#2 0x40acb2 in main ../sway/main.c:363
#3 0x7fdf6664c18a in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308
When you have an unfocused container (so one view is focused_inactive),
and you focus any other view in that container, the view with
focused_inactive was not damaged. This is because we damaged the
previous focus and new focus, but needed to damage the parent of the new
focus.
We would previously run all config commands without the environment,
which would appear to work as our socket name is the default one, but
wayland clients would start up in the wrong sway session.
(This explains why 'sometimes' my swayidle processes wouldn't die with
sway, as they weren't listening to the correct socket)
Fixes#2192.
seat_get_active_current_child is intended to return a child of the given
container which has finished its mapping transaction and is able to be
rendered on screen. The previous implementation was capable of returning
a pending child, which caused a child of a tabbed or stacked view to be
rendered prematurely while it was mapping.
If init fails halfway through it will call the destroy function,
which needs some coherent stuff filled.
Allocate with calloc and fill in what cannot fail first
Found through static analysis.
The check didn't include && ws_num < 100 so l would always be 1 or 2
Instead of fixing logic it's simpler to just call snprintf twice to get
length and use that.
Also change malloc failure check to sway_assert because both callers of
this function do not do null check and would segfault...
Found through static analysis.
No logic change here, this one is mostly to please static analyzer:
- client->fd can never be -1 (and if it could, close() a few lines below
would have needed the same check)
- we never send permission denied error (dead code)
ipc_send_reply already does client disconnect on error, so we shouldn't
do it again.
We also need to process current index again as disconnect removes client
from the list we currently are processing (this is an indexed "list")
Found through static analysis.
size_t/ssize_t are 8 bytes on 64bit systems, so use the proper size to
transmit that information.
This could lead to ridiculously large alloc as len is not initialized to zero
Found through static analysis
- child would leak in the workspace_record_pid path
- removing malloc lets us get rid of That Comment nobody seems
to remember what it was about
- we would leak pipe fds on first fork failling
- we didn't return an error if second fork failed
- the final executed process still had both pipe fds
(would show up in /proc/23560/fd in launched programs)
- we would write twice to the pipe if execl failed for some reason
(e.g. if /bin/sh doesn't exist?!)
When you spawn a process with the exec command, sway now notes the
workspace you had focused and the pid of the child process, then assigns
that workspace to the child when its window appears.
Some of this is carried over from sway 0.15, but with some major
refactoring and centralization of state.
